What is the case law supporting a payee’s position that re-partnership enhances their ability to pay for their spouses’ expenses?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Coady v. Coady, 2014 MBQB 182 (CanLII):
In support of the payee’s position, her counsel has also raised two other points, supported by case law. The first proposition is that “re-partnering” enhances a payor’s ability to pay. The authority submitted is Beattie v. Beattie, 2013 SKQB 127, 418 Sask.R. 119.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a spouse entitled to spousal support when the spouse dies? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the burden of spousal support for a spouse who remarries? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the effect of a delay in seeking spousal support if the husband has been seeking support for more than a year? (Manitoba, Canada)
When will the court order an estimated or estimated amount of expenses to be paid by the requesting spouse? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining the appropriate amount of spousal support for a separated spouse? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on indefinite support for a spouse? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a spouse is entitled to spousal support on a compensatory basis? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the compensatory method for the purpose of determining the amount of support awarded to a spouse who works in the home? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a spouse be denied spousal support by his wife's estate? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the effect on spousal and child support when the petitioner stops paying child support? (Manitoba, Canada)
