Is a plaintiff entitled to a fee for commencing a Part 7 action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mollaei v. Luo, 2015 BCSC 1143 (CanLII):

Relying on the decision of Registrar Sainty in Park v. Koepke, 2013 BCSC 1806, the plaintiff claims the fee for commencing the Part 7 action on the basis that it is an adjunct to the tort litigation. The defendants submit that this is not a proper disbursement in a tort action.

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to substantial damages in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff commenced an action a year before the limitation period expired? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a reproof or rebuke for the conduct of counsel in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to double costs under Rule 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure if it makes a single offer to settle two separate actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is a plaintiff entitled to damages for not following the recommendations of their doctors? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to represent himself personally in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.