The Papics plead “harassment” and intentional infliction of emotional distress. There is as yet no recognized common law tort of harassment: see Merrifield v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205, 145 O.R. (3d) 494, leave to appeal refused, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. 174. In my view, the circumstances of this case cannot plausibly warrant the recognition of such a tort. The claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is also fatally flawed: none of the conduct at issue was flagrant, outrageous, or calculated to harm the Papics.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.