Is a finding of misconduct based on the reasons for judgment?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Perrick (Re), 2014 LSBC 1 (CanLII):
In Law Society of Upper Canada v. Coady, 2009 ONLSHP 51 (CanLII), 2009 ONLSHP 0051, where the hearing panel relied on the reasons for judgment in making its finding of misconduct, noted:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of a finding of no misconduct in a professional conduct review panel finding no misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
When there is no trial, can a final judgment based on an affidavit be based on affidavits? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a formal offer to settle a claim against a plaintiff be apportioned costs based upon division of liability based upon a division of costs based on division of liabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an employee has been found guilty of misconduct by reason of gross misconduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons for judgment on a constitutional issue on “taking up” or interjurisdictional immunity? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a lack of consultation preclude a finding that the expense of medical malpractice is reasonable and necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for re-opening a judgment before a judgment has been entered? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a finding of professional misconduct by the Law Society of BC for failing to file a trust report? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
