On a motion for summary judgment, can the judge assume that the record contains all the evidence the parties will present if there is a trial?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Family & Children’s Services of St. Thomas and Elgin v. M.M., 2019 ONSC 4649 (CanLII):

On a motion for summary judgment, the motions judge is entitled to assume the record contains all the evidence the parties will present if there is a trial: Toronto Dominion Bank v. Hylton, 2012 ONCA 614, at para. 5. 2) Finding the Child in Need of Protection

Other Questions


On a motion for summary judgment, does the record contain all evidence that the parties will present if there is a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party who brings the motion as well as the witnesses upon whom the moving/applying party relies have an obligation to present and present witnesses to the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the record contain all the evidence that the parties would present at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a summary judgment motion judge have the authority to grant summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a court bound to assume that the record contains all the evidence the parties would provide if the matter proceeded to trial? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the record contain all of the evidence which the parties will present if there is a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the quality of evidence needed to be presented to the court in summary judgment motions? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a motion judge order summary judgment against a party in a personal injury matter? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a motion judge assume that no further evidence will be adduced at trial on any issue, including discoverability? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the role of the motions judge in deciding a motion for summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.