On appeal from the denial of a suppression motion, what presumptions are in favor of the trial court's factual findings?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Weiss, C069563 (Cal. App. 2012):
On appeal from the denial of a suppression motion, all presumptions are in favor of the trial court's factual findings, whether express or implied, where supported by substantial evidence, and we review de novo the facts favorable to the People to determine whether the officer's conduct was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (People v. Glaser (1995) 11 Cal.4th 354, 362.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, what is the standard on appeal from the denial of the suppress motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of a suppression motion, what is the test for relying solely on the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of a suppression motion, what is the test for relying solely on the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of a suppression motion, what is the test for relying solely on the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a suppression motion on appeal, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
On appeal of a denial of a motion to suppress evidence, what is the state of the law with respect to the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court defer to the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
