On a motion to suppress, can the trial court determine the credibility of the witness?

In reviewing a finding on a suppression motion, what are the implications of the trial court's ruling on the suppression motion? (California, United States of America)

When a defendant challenges on appeal a motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, does he accept the credibility determinations and findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)

Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will the court reverse determinations by the trial court concerning the credibility of witnesses? (California, United States of America)

Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)

When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)

In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)

Is there a duty of the court to protect the credibility of a witness from cross-examination questions that "harass, annoy or humiliate the witness's credibility"? (California, United States of America)

On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)

When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)