Occupational rent was described by Mr. Justice Rogers in Hack v. Hack, 2013 BCSC 2134 at para. 39 as having “an uneasy relationship with family law.” In non-family law cases, occupational rent is claimed by a co-owner who has been ousted from the property on the basis that a co-owner has the right to equal entitlement to use of the property. Ouster is no longer required as perquisite to advance a claim. In family law cases, Rogers J. said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.