Cory J. succinctly described this ‘objective/subjective’ assessment as “... whether a reasonable person in the circumstances of the plaintiff would have consented to the proposed treatment if all the risks had been disclosed.” (Arndt v. Smith, 1997 CanLII 360 (SCC),  2 S.C.R. 539 at 554, 148 D.L.R. (4th) 48). 2. Evidence
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.