Does the meaning of the expression "cause of action" need to be interpreted in the context of cases where the issue of jurisdiction does not arise?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Rural Municipality of St. Louis v. Markham, 1921 CanLII 341 (SK QB):

It is evident then that the case of Noxon v. Holmes, supra, and the other decisions to the like effect, all of which define the expression "cause of action" with reference solely to its use in connection with Courts of inferior jurisdiction, and which give it the particular meaning assigned to it expressly by reason of the limited authority of such Courts, are not safe guides to follow in cases where the question of jurisdiction does not arise.

Other Questions


Does the word "cause of action" mean the whole cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the words “not resulting in death” in the context of medical malpractice cases? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of words in a libel case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the "ordinary rule” in the context of a sale of land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the limitation period for an amendment to an action raising a new cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence a second action for damages arising out of the same circumstances? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the expression “null and void” in the context of null and void? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a prima facie cause of action in a personal injury action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of the trial judge in the context of sexual assault cases? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.