In Lane v. Lane, [1991] B.C.J. No. 3246, a decision not referred to in any of the above, Newbury J. ordered a lump sum payment to reimburse a wife for past accounting and legal expenses although she refused to order payment of estimated future legal expenses. The lump sum payment ordered was to be accounted for by the wife on the final determination of family assets and each spouse’s respective entitlement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.