In cases dealing with the well-being of children, a court is not obliged to reach specific factual conclusions as to what has transpired while children have been in their parents’ care in making an order respecting parenting arrangements: NDT v. TFT, 2016 BCSC 134 at para. 103. This principle is recognized implicitly in s. 37(3) of the Family Law Act, which provides only that the best interests of a child be advanced through an order that protects a child’s physical, psychological and emotional safety, security, and well-being to the greatest possible extent. This wording contemplates that evidence in family cases is often of a type that may be only suggestive of the truth, and that resists drawing specific conclusions: NDT v. TFT, 2016 BCSC 134 at para. 103.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.