The learned trial judge characterised the plaintiff’s position in the following words: [i]n the present case, the plaintiff’s position, if accepted, would mean that the adverse inference was taken as proof of a specific negligent act. (At paragraph 21). He went on to state that the case relied upon by the plaintiff, Murray v. Saskatoon, (supra.), was not authority for the proposition advanced by the plaintiff.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.