What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has unreasonably failed to take steps that would have reduced her damages?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Dhaliwal v Kublick, 2019 BCSC 1285 (CanLII):

The defendants bear the onus of establishing that the plaintiff has unreasonably failed to take steps that would have reduced her damages: Mullens v. Toor, 2016 BCSC 1645, aff’d 2017 BCCA 384.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has failed to mitigate damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test to apply in determining whether damages should be reduced to account for a plaintiff’s failure to mitigate? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have an obligation to reduce their damages by reducing the damages in the context of a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate her loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff acted unreasonably in failing to obtain the recommended treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to full compensation for non-pecuniary damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is mitigation of damages determined when a plaintiff fails to follow a personal trainer's advice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered in determining whether a plaintiff would have continued to work, or not? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a hypothetical or speculative opportunity can be used to determine damages for future loss of earnings as a result of a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness factor in determining whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.