Is a pleading in paragraph 52 of the Statement of Claim inadequate to disclose a reasonable cause of action?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from William E. Robb Enterprises Inc. v. ATI Technologies Inc., 2006 CanLII 39466 (ON SC):
Accordingly, the pleading in paragraph 52 of the Statement of Claim is struck as failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action with leave to amend to set out a cause of action based on the principle in Prosser v. Naziri. The Rule 25.11 Motion
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to strike a statement of claim as disclosing no reasonable cause of action pursuant to Rule 21(1b)? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a motion to amend a statement of claim to assert a new ground of relief arising out of the same facts in a dental malpractice action constitute pleading a new cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a statement of claim for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action a material fact? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for striking a claim or portion of a claim that discloses no reasonable cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing an action as prescribed on the basis that the cause of action had accrued more than 6 years before the Statement of Claim was issued? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a statement of claim be struck where there is no reasonable cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
On a motion to dismiss a claim for failure to disclose a cause of action, is the statement of defence sufficient to accommodate drafting deficiencies? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test to strike a statement of claim as disclosing no cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for striking out a pleading that discloses no reasonable cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
Is restatement of its financial statements an acknowledgment by the company that it has made material misrepresentations in relation to its audited financial statements valid for a cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
