Is a motion for reconsideration the venue for new arguments or new evidence that could have been made at the initial hearing?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Apotex Inc. v Kalinka, 2016 CanLII 81983 (ON SC):

A motion for reconsideration is not the venue for new arguments or new evidence that could have been made and/or led at the initial hearing: Mujagic v. Kamps, supra at para. 13; Sykes v. Sykes, [1995] B.C.J. No. 821 (B.C.C.A.) at paras. 6, 12.

Other Questions


What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of no confidence in a motion to amend the terms of a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the basis to overturn a motion judge’s ruling that the valuation evidence tendered after cross-examinations is not admissible on the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for elevated costs of a motion for a motion to amend a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the basis for a motion to admit fresh evidence in an extradition hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining if a motion is a genuine issue requiring a trial based only on the evidence in the Motion Record? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the respondent in an extradition hearing be required to summarize the evidence before granting him an evidentiary hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to both hear this appeal and to consider the motion to adduce fresh evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will arguments of argument on a summary judgment motion only be made where there is a strong prima facie foundation in the record? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.