Is a claim for misfeasance required to name individual public officers?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from 0956375 B.C. Ltd. v Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen, 2020 BCSC 743 (CanLII):

In Moses v. Lower Nicola Indian Band, 2015 BCCA 61at paras. 44 and 45, Justice Newbury noted that a claim for misfeasance was required to name the individual public officers and gave the plaintiff leave to amend his pleading:

Other Questions


Does the tort of misfeasance in public office apply to an individual officer or officer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a claim of misfeasance in public office be made out against one public official? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a public statute, empowering public actors to accomplish public goals, alone give rise to a private duty between those public actors and a particular member of the public? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts dealt with claims of defamation, defamation and misfeasance in public office? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim of misfeasance in public office? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes the tort of misfeasance in public office? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that a director, officer or employee was acting within the course of employment preclude a claim in negligence against the individual respondents personally? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a public by-law or statute authorizing the fluoridation of public water violate an individual's s .7 rights? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a tort of misfeasance in a public office? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.