What is the penalty for knowing participation in mortgage fraud?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Law Society of Upper Canada v. Snidr, 2014 ONLSTH 56 (CanLII):

In Law Society of Upper Canada v. Mucha, 2008 ONLSAP 5 (CanLII), the appeal panel at paras. 23 and 28 found that revocation is the ordinary penalty for knowing participation in mortgage fraud. The public interest must be the overriding consideration in such cases, and only “extraordinary or exceptional circumstances” permit a departure from a disposition of revocation. Such circumstances could include “compelling psychiatric or psychological evidence” that could explain why the misconduct occurred, why the actions were out of character and why it was unlikely to happen again.

Other Questions


What is the law society’s position on penalty for knowing participation in mortgage fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for misconduct short of knowing participation or assistance in mortgage fraud cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a revocation of a mortgage where a licensee has knowingly participated in mortgage fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of knowing participation in mortgage fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a mortgage with attornation clause in the mortgage law apply to a mortgage where the mortgage is not attornment clause? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for knowing assistance in mortgage fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for “unwitting” mortgage fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the consequences of knowing assistance in mortgage fraud on appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the penalty for knowingly committing or assisting fraud on a party not a licensee’s client? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a mortgage lender's ability to assess the value of a mortgage security under mortgage law? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.