What are the implications of a decision not to hear a case on the grounds that it is moot?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Chartier v. Chartier Estate (Trustee of), 2012 MBQB 243 (CanLII):

Moreover, this case raises a novel point with ramifications beyond the circumstances here. The decision not to hear a case on the basis that it is moot is discretionary and courts may choose to hear a case in order to resolve a legal point of import even where it will have no impact on the parties before the court (see e.g. Tremblay v. Daigle, 1989 CanLII 33 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 530, at par. 10).

Other Questions


Does the doctrine supporting finality of court decisions apply equally to decisions made by administrative officers or tribunals? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the decisive ground of appeal in a sexual assault case where the trial judge failed to relate the evidence crucial to the defence to the issues to be decided by the jury? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a motion judge's decision not to interfere with the decision of the motion judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does a decision-maker have the authority to make a decision in a de novo hearing? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for making a decision in a child protection case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the grounds for a motion of no confidence in a family law case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the implications of a common-law partner’s claim in equity for the sale of their jointly-held land? (Manitoba, Canada)
What kind of jurisdiction does the governing legislation give to a decision-maker? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does the doctrine of mootness apply to an action or proceeding? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a judge review a finding of mixed fact and law in respect of the reasonable and probable grounds for the demand for breath samples? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.