How have the principles of a manufacturer been interpreted in the context of a boat case in which a boat was specifically manufactured to American standards?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Moses v. Shore Boat Builders Ltd., 1993 CanLII 2276 (BC CA):
24 Moran v. Pyle, supra, involved a light bulb manufacturer whose products were widely distributed. The principles there laid down apply with even greater force in the case at bar, where the boat was specifically manufactured to American standards for Moses' use in Alaska.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the principles of tortfeasor's law been interpreted in the context of the case law, and what are the principles with respect to animals generally? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a court to interpret the interpretation of the House of Commons Bill of Representatives in the context of cross-party legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a "deposit clause" in standard form contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the Sparling principles been interpreted in the context of civil litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the significance of the relative standard of living of the parties post post post-war compared to the standard living standard in their respective countries? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for constitutional interpretation in the context of "interpretation"? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of equalization in the context of the Rules of Justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can ICBC argue that s. 91 of the Insurance Code of Canada Act, s.91(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, or s.92 of the Act, be interpreted in the context of statutory interpretation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted contracts in the context of the interpretation of contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
