How have courts interpreted the doctrine of parental preference?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Khan v. Kong, 2007 CanLII 61091 (ON SC):
Moores v. Feldstein, supra, has been consistently cited as the decision marking the movement away from the parental preference doctrine. Distinguishing Facts
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a court to determine if a parent who has been ordered to pay child protection funds for the past 10 years will not comply with the terms of the court order? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the court grant relief under the Fletcher doctrine under the Rylands v. Fletcher doctrine? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court change a parenting order to address a specific issue while still maintaining the overall parenting scheme? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a parent be found in contempt of court for passively permitting the court order to be undermined? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for parenting time between the parents of a child and a non-custodial parent? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances would a parent be denied custody in a custody battle between a parent and a non-parent? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the doctrine of misrepresentation in the context of square footage in real estate transactions? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a parent's best interests is to restrict access to a parent who lives in another parent's home? (Ontario, Canada)
