Does a plaintiff have a positive duty to mitigate in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mills v Graham, 2019 BCSC 641 (CanLII):

Mitigation goes to limit recovery based on an unreasonable failure of an injured party to take reasonable steps to limit their loss. As such, a plaintiff in a personal injury action has a positive duty to mitigate. However, the defendant bears the onus of proving a plaintiff has failed to mitigate: see Graham v. Rogers, 2001 BCCA 432 at para. 35.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a plaintiff's duty to mitigate their loss in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a plaintiff's duty to mitigate in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to mitigate damages in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.