The defendant asks me to reconsider my trial decision (see Mills v. Eglin, 2006 BCSC 1927) and a variation decision (2007 BCSC 1218) in order to consider the following matters: (a) The status of the intercompany debts and the resulting figures for property equalization as a result; (b) The status of the monies paid by the plaintiff from Solstice and the resulting responsibility for income taxes with respect to the same; and (c) Appropriate date for the equalization of the RRSPs between the parties.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.