In Milina v. Bartsch (1985), 5 C.P.C. (2d) 124 at 125-6, Mr. Justice Seaton, in chambers, said: The most likely reason to grant security, or not grant security would be the financial position of the appellant. If he could say that security would prevent him from conducting an appeal I would be very slow to order security in the absence of the finding that the appeal was frivolous, or something of that nature.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.