What is the test for requiring an appellant to pay some costs and to post security for other costs?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kuntz v. McGraw, 1998 CanLII 4484 (BC CA):

On this application for an order requiring the appellant to pay some costs and to post security for other costs, counsel agree that because the appellant is impecunious, the applicants bear the onus of establishing that the appeal is hopeless. When an appellant is impecunious, it is well settled that the court should be "very slow to order security in the absence of a finding that the appeal is frivolous, or something of that nature:" Milina v. Bartsch (1985), 5 C.P.C. (2d) 124, affirmed (1987), 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 99 (C.A.).

Other Questions


Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a secured party to a general security agreement require them to pay legal fees to preserve collateral? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for security for security costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is bad faith not required for bad faith in determining that a parent who is required to pay child support costs is intentionally unemployed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for requiring security for costs on appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for securing security for costs against a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining security for costs against an individual plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff has not used an item of service in the past, is it appropriate to include that cost in the future cost award? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for security for costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that would require the court to order costs that follow the event? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.