Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24, is seen as broadening the context in which agreements can be overturned moving from the limited circumstances where a court could find a radical and unforeseen change in circumstances casually connected to the marriage as in the Pelech trilogy to a broader discretion to assess the weight to be given to each objective in the spousal support provisions of the Divorce Act and to assess these and to give weight to each of these objectives in the back drop of the parties' circumstances.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.