What was the mutual impression that spousal support would not be resurrected?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Prince v. Soenen, 2015 MBQB 31 (CanLII):
All of the above conveyed the mutual impression that spousal support would not be resurrected. It demonstrated “their intention to release one another from all claims to spousal support” (see Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303, at p. 352).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of a delay in seeking spousal support if the husband has been seeking support for more than a year? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the effect on spousal and child support when the petitioner stops paying child support? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the principles underlying spousal support? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a husband's entitlement to spousal support after he and his wife retire? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a court make a spousal support order retroactive to the date of the parties’ separation? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the legal basis for a spousal support claim? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a father entitled to spousal and/or child support from the time of the parties’ separation? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a spouse be denied spousal support by his wife's estate? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the burden of spousal support for a spouse who remarries? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a spouse is entitled to spousal support on a compensatory basis? (Manitoba, Canada)
