How much contributory negligence has been apportioned to a plaintiff who tripped on a crack?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Bourgoin v. Leamington (Municipality), 2006 CanLII 11904 (ON SC):

In Michalak v. Oakville (City), [2000] O.J. No. 4466, a plaintiff, walking in an unfamiliar area, tripped on a crack that created a height difference of less than an inch. The day was bright and clear and the crack was readily visible even from across the road. The plaintiff’s contributory negligence was apportioned at 25%.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the court attribute contributory negligence to a plaintiff who falls on an icy sidewalk in the month of February? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for contributory negligence on the basis that a design defect in a suction valve caused a plaintiff to lose his hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of contributory negligence on a plaintiff who, as a result of a slip and fall, deliberately walks across dangerous ice? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for contributory negligence against an injured plaintiff? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the range of contributory negligence awards for a plaintiff who falls on a patch of ice? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that allows a plaintiff to plead both an intentional tort of negligence and an unintentional tort of intentional negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proving a plaintiff’s negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a plaintiff's ferry from Belleville to any point west of the colorable distance from plaintiff’s ferry? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a charge of dangerous driving under s. 249 of the Criminal Code constitute a gross negligence of gross negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the limitation period for a plaintiff to sue her doctor for negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.