What are the reasons for a judge's decision regarding the children's primary residence?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from McMahon v. Stevens, 2012 BCSC 185 (CanLII):

Mr. Justice Truscott provided reasons for his decision regarding the children’s primary residence at paras. 6-7 of the judgment in McMahon v. Stevens (11 August 2011), Vancouver E103662 (S.C.):

Other Questions


Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
How to read the reasons of the adjudicator as a whole to assess whether the decision was reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given by the judge in the context of the date of trial for value of a family residence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s. 215.5(7) of the BCSC prohibit the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles from extending the decision date of a decision until after the date of the decision has been determined? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for "reasonableness" for a review body to determine whether a decision was reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is mixed fact and law relevant in the context of the trial judge's decision regarding the potential sale of the business? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge be able to substitute his or her own decision on a rehearing of a Master's decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a judge erred in treating the mother as the primary residence or custodial parent? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does an adjudicator’s decision not to grant a hearing be regarded as reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a chambers judge's decision not to refer the matter to the Registrar rather than the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.