How has the BCSC interpreted the hearsay rule?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Narvaez v. Zhang, 2010 BCSC 78 (CanLII):
The defendants submitted the case of McKnight v. Hutchison, 2003 BCSC 1240 for the proposition that affidavit evidence that offends the hearsay rule cannot be given weight and is thus insufficient to address necessity or reasonableness of disbursements.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does an order made pursuant to rule 9-7(15) of the Rules of Appeal Rule 2.1 require leave to appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the rules of interpretation in the interpretation of tax legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BCSC interpreted Rule 14-1(9) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure regarding the exercise of discretion of the Court of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the word "wilful delay or default" in Rule 52(5) of Rule 52 of the Rules of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a sub-rule (14) and (26) of Rule 27 of the Rules of Civil Procedure be engaged? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 30 of the Rule 40A of the Rules of Civil Procedure on an application for a medical examination that comes three weeks before trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with motions under Rule 34 and Rule 19(24)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted Rule 30(1) and Rule 7-6(1? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 37 of the Rules of Appeal Rule 37 on a motion of appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
