Can an implied undertaking constitute a cause of action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cook v. The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 1289 (CanLII):

According to the applicants, an implied undertaking is not a contract or promise to an opposite party. It is an obligation to the court and, on that basis, it cannot constitute a cause of action (McDaniel v. McDaniel, 2008 BCSC 653; para. 33; rev’d on other grounds, 2009 BCCA 53).

Other Questions


What is the scope of the implied undertaking in the context of an implied undertaking? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts accepted that a letter constitutes an acknowledgment of a cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a notice of fast track action in form 61 form 61 constitute a "fast track action"? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a new action be brought against the same parties in the same cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What causes of action have been struck out of a class action for breach of section 61 of the Competition Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of pleading in a personal injury action where there are several causes of action against multiple parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can knowledge of a cause of cause be used as grounds for cause of dismissal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court refuse to enforce an undertaking in a cause where the undertaking was given under an admitted mistake? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.