In what circumstances will the court uphold a summary trial in cases where credibility is at stake?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Creyke v. Creyke, 2014 BCSC 1632 (CanLII):
In Mayer v. Mayer, 2012 BCCA 77, the court made a number of further observations on the issue of summary trial suitability in cases where credibility is at stake. At paras. 80-81, the court commented that:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a summary trial, in what circumstances will the court consider postponement issues in a full trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a single issue is proposed for summary trial by way of summary trial, does the court have any consideration in deciding the issue as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a summary trial be held on an application for summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts in BC considered credibility and the impact on medical evidence in assessing credibility and credibility? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court grant judgment by summary trial on a single issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury trial, is there any case law or case law relevant to assessing the credibility of witnesses? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances has the BCSC considered a summary summary of the facts of the case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
