What is the test for “entirely consistent” with “consent or tacit permission” by the owners of a servient property?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Mason v. Partridge, 2003 NSSC 254 (CanLII):
I find that, as was the situation in Mason v. Morrow, the evidence is “at least equally consistent with expressed or tacit permission” by the owners of the servient property.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a claim against a servient owner of a property where the use of the property is not permitted? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining a prescriptive easement to prevent the owner of a servient property from using the servient's land? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a finding of unjust enrichment in the context of a claim for the return of a portion of the proceeds of a property acquired through the sale of real property? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the difference between a consent order and a consent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a servient tenement owner stop the use of their driveway? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does a consent to adoption end with the signing of a parent's consent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for ousting a property owner under the statute of limitations? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can implied consent be implied consent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the appropriate date for the consent of the left behind parent in cases of openended or indeterminate consent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the effect of Stage Two analysis on property division provisions of a marriage agreement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
