What are the implications of a Mareva injunction on an ex parte application?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from China Citic Bank Corporation Limited v. Yan, 2016 BCSC 2332 (CanLII):

Because Mareva injunctions are invariably sought on ex parte applications, they are subject to the general rules governing such applications. Those are summarized in Pierce v. Jivraj, 2013 BCSC 1850 at para. 37:

Other Questions


Is a failure to meet the disclosure obligation on an ex parte application sufficient to bar the applicant from seeking the same injunctive relief? (British Columbia, Canada)
In determining whether to grant a Rule 18A trial on part of a trust application, what is the risk that the findings of the application may be carried over to the subsequent determination of other issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
When bringing an ex parte application, can the applicant make full and frank disclosure of all material facts? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application to set aside a Mareva injunction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an alternative argument that the application of a law of general application to a particular group of Indians in a particular activity is legislation in their Indian-ness? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a Mareva injunction create a security? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for counsel for the prevailing party in an ex parte application to obtain an order from the affected party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the consequences of a long delay in making an injunction application? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an interim support application, can the court get bogged down with the merits of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.