Is it necessary that a full disclosure process is completed?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Coady v. Burton Canada, 2012 NSSC 257 (CanLII):
While Justice Hood did state, in MacNeil v. Nova Scotia, 2010 NSSC 138, at § 7, that it is not necessary that full disclosure processes be completed, this was qualified by her observation that “it is, of course, necessary that there be sufficient material before the motions judge to make a determination . . . each case, of course, will require different material”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the internal workings of the discipline process protected from disclosure? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting disclosure of privileged information? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for deliberate secrecy in the adjudication process? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the remedies for abuse of process? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the mere passage of time or the normal process of aging constitute a material change in circumstances for a variation of a spousal support order? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a statutory court control its own process? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the implications of a disclosure statement in a contract? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the phrase "necessary in the public interest"? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is the employer required to make all necessary provisions for occupational safety and health of employees? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any case law where privilege has been waived by disclosure? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
