With respect, there is no rule of law or practice that a treating physician cannot testify as an expert. To the extent the trial judge suggests that such a practice may be problematical, I am of the view that she erred. MacEachern v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 939 does not stand for that proposition. It concerns the propriety of an opposing party approaching a treating physician to obtain evidence. The weight to be given to the evidence of any physician, whether they be the treating physician or an independent expert, will depend on the circumstances of the particular case. In many cases, the treating physician will in fact be in the best position to opine on the injuries that a party has suffered. SUMMARY
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.