In LSUC v. Armstrong[4], applying LSUC v. Birman, supra, the appeal panel described five components that inform the good character analysis: (a) the nature and duration of the misconduct; (b) whether the applicant is remorseful; (c) what rehabilitative efforts, if any, had been taken and the success of such efforts; (d) the applicant’s conduct since the misconduct; and (e) the passage of time since the misconduct.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.