In conduct applications, it is well-established that a licensee will ordinarily bear the expense where misconduct is found. However, there is no such presumption in licensing applications. As outlined in Polanski v. Law Society of Ontario,[1] the same logic regarding costs does not necessarily apply in a licensing application as in a conduct application. The applicant’s conduct examined by the hearing panel is not conduct as a regulated professional, and the ultimate question is whether the applicant is currently of good character, rather than addressing a past statutory breach with an appropriate penalty.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.