Can a net discount rate of 4% based upon the evidence that was tendered at trial be altered?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from McLeod v. Palardy, 1981 CanLII 2669 (MB CA):
In view of the Lewis v. Todd decision, the decision of the learned trial Judge in the instant case to adopt a net discount rate of 4% based upon the evidence which was tendered at trial cannot be disturbed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the court have for reference the trial in the civil proceedings before Simonsen J., with the finding on the evidence respecting breaches of trust and misappropriation of funds? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a verdict of first degree murder based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the decisive ground of appeal in a sexual assault case where the trial judge failed to relate the evidence crucial to the defence to the issues to be decided by the jury? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any new evidence that the husband now proposes to tender as "new"? (Manitoba, Canada)
In a motion for directed verdict, in what circumstances will the trial judge not have considered the evidence of Timothy? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a failure to admit or deny relevant evidence a breach of natural justice? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a witness be physically excluded from a trial? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for oral evidence in a personal injury action? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a trial judge's findings of fact and the inferences drawn by her? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for evidence of fraud in an insurance claim? (Manitoba, Canada)
