How have courts considered a decision relied upon by counsel for counsel for the proposed defendant?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kennedy v. Turtle Bay Marina Inc., 2013 BCSC 1829 (CanLII):
In Letvad v. Fenwick, 2000 BCCA 630, a decision relied upon by counsel for the proposed defendant, Mr. Justice Esson considered and analyzed Teal Cedar Products (1977) Ltd. Esson J.A. writes as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court consider any new or additional material that counsel have submitted to the Court? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff add to the list of defendants on an appeal from the Master's decision not to name the proposed defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an obligation of counsel for an applicant for an ex parte order, as an officer of the court, to disclose any facts which might have influenced the court's decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s. 215.5(7) of the BCSC prohibit the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles from extending the decision date of a decision until after the date of the decision has been determined? (British Columbia, Canada)
When considering a long-term mental health case, is it possible for the court to consider a single clinical record? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's decision not to award costs to a defendant who has been found guilty of negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court consider 4 costs considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the court have to consider prior no fault examinations before making a decision on a no fault examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
