Reviewing Lafontaine #1, I see no error in the judge’s approach or the conclusions he reached in interpreting the easement. While some of the principles the judge deployed (e.g., those from Sherbinin v. Jackson, 2011 BCSC 74) were drawn from pre-Sattva jurisprudence, the considerations that informed the judge’s analysis remain appropriate at law.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.