What percentage of core compensation is to be interpreted as representing the maximum core compensation available?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Vanmaele Estate (Re), 2018 ABQB 840 (CanLII):
The cases further suggest that the higher percentages are to be interpreted as representing the maximum amount of core compensation available. See for example: Kush v. Devaleriola, [1997] A.J. No. 648.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the provisions of section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How has section 1 of the Interpretation Act, 1889, been interpreted? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a fire insurance contract? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court interpreted an offer to maintain a water system and provide water to a number of residents? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the liability of the estate, the personal representative and the surviving spouse for funeral expenses? (Alberta, Canada)
How have restrictive covenants been interpreted in the context of real estate law? (Alberta, Canada)
How much is a plaintiff’s claim for medical malpractice compensation? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a collective agreement be interpreted as a statutory right? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the material contribution test been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "contract" in the context of an enforceable contract? (Alberta, Canada)
