Is a proviso requiring a notice of intent before an entry to a building is included?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Creamer v. Gooderham, 1914 CanLII 126 (SK CA):

From a perusal, however, of the notes of Keech v. Hall, 1 Smith’s Leading Cases, 11th ed., 530, and following, it appears settled that notice is not necessary before entry and, to quote from page 532, that such a proviso is “a covenant only and no lease.”

Other Questions


What is the test for giving a written notice of notice of intent to commence an action against an individual? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is a reasonable excuse can be established in a notice notice application if someone is temporarily incapable of attending to his affairs or giving instructions during the notice period? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an affidavit filed in breach of the requirements of the Rules of Civil Procedure requiring strict compliance? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an announcement required for a warrantless entry? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a person who entered a building before entering the building can bring an action for trespass? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a mortgagee be able to recover from the loss of a brick building and the damage to another brick building? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a notice of notice necessary in circumstances where a plaintiff is seeking to sue for damages of more than £200,000? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the phrase "appear in person" include the ordinary entry of appearance after service of a writ of summons? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What constitutes sufficient particulars in a notice of intention to amend a teacher's contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a lessor have covenanted that neither he nor his "assigns" will erect or permit a building in front of the building line on land adjoining the lessor's premises? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.