How have courts interpreted the factors identified in Contino, supra?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hadesbeck v. Hadesbeck, 2010 SKQB 385 (CanLII):
In Johnson v. Johnson 2010 SKQB 227, McIntyre J. was faced with a situation in which the parties did not, or chose not to, provide evidence or argument with respect to the factors identified in Contino, supra. He stated at para. 37:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts considered "supra" (supra) in an arbitration decision? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of words in a libel case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is conduct of the parties a factor in determining whether or not a child has been found to be a contributing factor in a custody decision? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a surrender statement in the context of a commercial lease? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a plea of non est factum? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a caveat in a real estate transaction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What factors will the court consider in determining interim distribution of family property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted answers to the jury in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the factors used by the courts to determine the best interests of the children of a parent who wants to relocate? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
