If a plaintiff has not used a particular item or service in the past, is it inappropriate to include its cost in the future care award?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mohan v. Khan, 2012 BCSC 436 (CanLII):

If a plaintiff has not used a particular item or service in the past it may be inappropriate to include its cost in a future care award. (Izony v. Weidlich, 2006 BCSC 1315 at para. 74).

Other Questions


Is a plaintiff entitled to a future care award where they have not used a particular service in the past? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it inappropriate to make an award for services that a plaintiff has not used in the past or is unlikely to use in the future? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff has not used an item of service in the past, is it appropriate to include that cost in the future cost award? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff recover for future care costs if they have not used a particular item or service in the past? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of future care costs for a plaintiff who has not used a particular service or product in the past? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating future care costs for a plaintiff who has not used a particular service or product in the past? (British Columbia, Canada)
In assessing future loss of earning capacity for loss of past and future earning capacity, what is the test for a loss of future earnings allowance? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a future care award for the purposes of calculating future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a plaintiff’s future care cost of future care award? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.