What is the test for calculating future care costs in a medical malpractice case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cummings v. Hitt, 2015 BCSC 530 (CanLII):

In addition to being medically necessary, future care costs must be justified because they are likely to be incurred by the plaintiff. The award of damages is thus a matter of prediction as to what will happen in the future. If a plaintiff has not used a particular item or service in the past it may be inappropriate to include its cost in a future care award: Izony v. Weidlich, 2005 BCSC 1315.

Other Questions


Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating future care costs in a medical malpractice action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard for costs of future care in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is cost of future care a consideration in damages for future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the disposition of a medical malpractice case at a medical review board? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the validity of evidence in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care of the medical staff in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a medical malpractice case on the cost of production? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.