Is a motion to quash an appeal on the basis that the order is interlocutory in nature?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hopkins v. Kay, 2015 ONCA 112 (CanLII):
The respondent’s motion to quash this appeal on the basis that the order is interlocutory in nature was dismissed on the ground that the refusal to stay or dismiss an action based on lack of jurisdiction is a final order: Hopkins v. Kay, 2014 ONCA 514 (CanLII). ISSUE
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the consequences of a Director's Delegate's Order and Order to quash or to set aside or quash the two orders and decisions? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for lifting a stay of execution on a motion to lift an order that would have lifted the stay of an order requiring the lifting of the order? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a Master or Judge in chambers have the power to amend an Order of Appeal where the Master has appealed from the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
If a judge granted leave to appeal against an interim order, would the appeal against the interim order be successful? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of a motion judge's order of the motions judge on a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a cost order be made on an interlocutory motion for a final disposition of an appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of an appeal from the order of the original motion judge, set aside the order dismissing the action and granted leave to amend the statement of claim as against Larkin? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the 2008 Appeal Decision on the 2002 and 2005 Orders on the issue of interlocutory subjects apply to the interim subjects contained in the interim orders? (Ontario, Canada)
When will a court order an interim order to place a temporary order on a temporary parent? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the term "support order" need to be changed to include "support orders" in the definition of a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
