California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Guthreau, 102 Cal.App.3d 436, 162 Cal.Rptr. 376 (Cal. App. 1980):
[102 Cal.App.3d 443] Guthreau further charges error in the court's refusal to instruct the jury on diminished capacity set forth in CALJIC 3.35. 2 He relies improvidently on People v. Mayberry, supra, 15 Cal.3d 143, 125 Cal.Rptr. 745, 542 P.2d 1337, in arguing voluntary intoxication is a defense to rape. Guthreau would rewrite the rape law of this state from a general intent to a specific intent crime.
"(R)ape and sodomy are general intent crimes . . . ." (People v. Potter, 77 Cal.App.3d 45, 51, 143 Cal.Rptr. 379, 382; cf., People v. Thornton, 11 Cal.3d 738, 765, 114 Cal.Rptr. 467, 523 P.2d 267, cert. den. 420 U.S. 924, 95 S.Ct. 1118, 43 L.Ed.2d 393.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.