The following excerpt is from Henry v. Prunty, 127 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 1997):
We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is sufficient relevant evidence that a reasonable juror might conclude that Lashley lacked the requisite culpable state of mind necessary to be guilty of an Eighth Amendment violation. 2 See Maynard v. City of San Jose, 37 F.3d 1396, 1404 (9th Cir.1994); LeMaire v. Maass, 12 F.3d 1444, 1451 (9th Cir.1993).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.