Is there sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that the California Criminal Street Gang is a criminal street gang?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Dugan, D058093, Super. Ct. No. RIF131624 (Cal. App. 2011):

p. 620; People v. Duran (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 1448, 1465.) Accordingly, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding ECB is a criminal street gang.

Other Questions


Is a member of a street gang who actively participates in any criminal street gang with knowledge that its members engage in criminal gang activity liable for criminal activity? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes a substantive offense under Section 186.22 of the California Criminal Code for "participating in any criminal street gang with knowledge that its members engage in or have engaged in criminal gang activity"? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Street Gang Guidelines apply to criminal street gangs? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to a person convicted of a criminal street crime committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Criminal Code punish a person who actively participates in any criminal street gang with knowledge that its members engage in or have engaged in criminal gang activity? (California, United States of America)
Are Westside and Eastside street gangs considered to be "criminal street gangs" under section 1021.5 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court find sufficient evidence to find that the crime was committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a jury's finding that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict, does the appellate court have any power to substitute the findings of the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the use of evidence of criminal street gang activity by a defendant to establish a predicate offence in a prosecution for active participation in a criminal gang constitute prejudicial or prejudicial evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.